Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Cabaret DVD Contest
Enter to WIN the 40th anniversary edition Blu-ray of Cabaret courtesy of Warner Home Video here.
Simply leave your name and email and you'll be entered in our draw to win!
After you enter, read Moze Mossanen's interview with Louise Quick on Cabaret, Bob Fosse and life on Broadway here.
(*Note: contest is not open to Dance Media Group staff, Board of Directors or contributors)
Thursday, February 21, 2013
The Projected Body
41st Dance on Camera Festival in New York
February 1st – 5th, 2013
By Philip Szporer
Aarti Joseph in Dafeena by Marlene Millar and Philip Szporer with choreography by Natasha Bakht
When the Dance on Camera Festival (DCF) beckons with its annual call for submissions, there’s generally a current of excitement that ripples through the dance-film community. There’s the allure of New York of course, but having your film screen at the festival’s home base at Lincoln Center is not only noteworthy but a thrill.
More...
This year’s forty-first anniversary edition, produced by the Dance Films Association, boasted an international array of short films, archival pieces, documentaries, a retrospective of Shirley Clarke’s pioneering work, two programs of short films billed as “installations” (more on that later), as well as artists’ talks and other related exhibitions.
The festival’s administrative team is a new one – Christy Park, the DFA Executive Director, Liz Wolff, the DFA Festival Co-Curator, alongside longtime Film Society at Lincoln Center Festival Co-Curator Joanna Ney – so perhaps it’s too soon to gauge the direction they’re setting for the event, both for its own American dance filmmaker constituency, but also for participants from abroad. A festival should be a golden opportunity to see lots of material and get a better sense of the state of the art, mingle with colleagues and meet presenters in the field. At this edition, which ran from February 1st-5th, it appeared there was little attempt to highlight foreign filmmakers or bring participants together in meaningful dialogue. An exception was a brief meet-and-greet that was quickly eclipsed by a screening and a book signing at other venues. No programmers from international dance-film events were present at festival events. Nor were the press in evidence. Perhaps the most egregious oversight was not providing all filmmakers with nametags – only one tag was given per film. Most events were sold out, which was good for the festival, but because most filmmakers didn’t have a festival pass many didn’t see the films of their colleagues.
Who By Fire by Jacob Niedzwiecki with Buck 65 and Jenn Grant
Canadians were nonetheless well represented on screen. Gabrielle Lamb’s En Avant, Jacob Niedzwiecki’s Who By Fire, Thibault Duverneix and Victor Quijada’s Gravity of Center, Duncan McDowall’s Painted, and the short film Marlene Millar and I co-directed and produced, Dafeena, were featured in short film programs or screenings before features or documentaries. Our homegrown films stood shoulder to shoulder with offerings from the UK, France, Mexico, Russia, Japan, Spain, Australia, Italy, Sweden, Germany, Israel and the USA. A couple of highlights that I managed to see included the documentary Lads Go Dancing, a Swiss production by filmmaker Steve Walker about the Bern Ballet collaboration with rock band Kummerbuben, and the beautifully shot Menuett, by Finnish filmmaker Jukka Rajala-Granstubb.
The Shirley Clarke schedule of films – including Donna Cameron’s 1990 documentary portrait, Shirley Clarke: In Our Time, as well as Clarke’s own Dance in the Sun (1953), adapted from choreography by Daniel Nagrin, In Paris Parks .(1954), Bullfight (1955), and number of her other short 16-mm films – was significant. During Clarke’s lifetime (she died in 1997) her films and career rarely got the attention they deserved. The DCF retrospective coincided with the HD release of Cameron’s documentary as part of a tribute to Clarke’s life and work. Clarke began her artistic career as a dancer, training with the matriarchs of modern dance, including Martha Graham, Doris Humphrey and Hanya Holm. She turned to cinema and become a leading member of the independent filmmaking community in New York, co-founding the cinema-verité collective Film-Makers’ Cooperative alongside Albert Maysles and D.A. Pennebaker. Friends and collaborators included John Cassavetes, Agnes Varda and Maya Deren. Her faux documentary The Connections, about a group of heroin junkies, won the International Critics Prize at Cannes in 1966. The film ran afoul of the censors, due to its charged language. Her documentary Portrait of Jason (1967), about gay hustler and aspiring nightclub entertainer Jason Holliday, remains one of the most respected LGBT films. She was one of the few women working in the field at that time and was not always taken seriously, feeling the sting of discrimination throughout her career. Even receiving an Oscar for Best Documentary Feature for Robert Frost: A Lover’s Quarrel (1963) couldn’t enhance her clout in the film industry. In fact, she found it difficult to get financing for her films and was increasingly marginalized. Although she influenced many filmmakers, there has never been a significant re-release of her films.
Gravity of Center preview by Thibaut Duverneix with Rubberbandance Group
Not surprisingly DCF heavily supports and promotes American-made films, and as such provided a window into the financing for dance films stateside, which is limited at best. Many of the films credit university departments for their funding, while others seemed to be self-financed as no sources of funding whatsoever appeared in the credits. The Canadian ones were tagged with nods to either BravoFACT (clearly the last round of dance films to get funded by the foundation) and/or the Canada Council for the Arts, as well as other sources, and that alone speaks to a commitment to support this important and essential art form in our country.
I sensed that quite a number of the films screened were DIY projects, which is not necessarily a bad thing; however production values were wildly divergent and unjustified length was a serious issue - many pieces just went on and on with no sense of montage. Directors of photography were largely absent from many of the American offerings, which leads me to question what perspective these dance filmmakers are espousing: does capturing dance eclipse film language, so that even the basics of medium shots and close-ups aren’t explored? Too many of the films on view had no sound design or live sound recording, just a wallpaper music overlay, which makes me wonder if filmmakers are losing a grasp of these skills. Are we riding a wave of copycat production wherein bad practices are repeated? Or is it simply a case of people having easy access to a camera? Where is the power of camera movement and cutting rhythm? Creating dance film should be a collaboration between choreographer and filmmaker. Matthew Diamond’s 1999 Oscar-nominated documentary Dancemaker was screened again at this year’s festival. It’s important to remember what he once said about the making of dance films: “Shooting dance is not so much hard as it is insanely delicate. Wrong angle, wrong shot, wrong edit and the whole thing falls apart.”
Still shot of Aarti Joseph and Atri Nundy in Dafeena by Marlene Millar and Philip Szporer with choreography by Natasha Bakht
At the DCF “installation” stream of programming, I was expecting/hoping for an interactive gallery experience. But at the lovely 25CPW Gallery Space on Central Park West, the festival chose a bare white wall on which to project two clusters of films, never even turning off the gallery’s glaring lights. The festival program indicated that these films “inherit an experimental traditional whose origins can be found in European avant-garde movements of the twenties. Some are themselves experimental in nature, some are not; but they are challenging, meditative, and brave.” I’m not going to throw about criticisms of this or that film, but the vast majority of what was shown didn’t meet the context for the series. Sitting on the concrete floor for ninety minutes each time didn’t add to the experience.
Critic and writer Deborah Jowitt once wisely said something to the effect that bad dance is bad dance, no matter how imaginatively it’s filmed, and wondrous dance can still survive even the worst of renderings. That may be true, but with so much expertise at our disposal, it’s imperative that the goal of filmmakers be more than just achieving the marriage of two art forms.
Learn more >> vimeo.com/channels/danceoncamerafestival
Dafeena, Gravity of Center and Painted will all be at the 31st International Festival of Films on Art (FIFA) in Montréal, March 14th through 24th, 2013.
Dafeena, directed by Philip Szporer and Marlene Millar and featuring the choreography of Natasha Bakht will be available for streaming at bravofact.com later this year.
February 1st – 5th, 2013
By Philip Szporer
Aarti Joseph in Dafeena by Marlene Millar and Philip Szporer with choreography by Natasha Bakht
When the Dance on Camera Festival (DCF) beckons with its annual call for submissions, there’s generally a current of excitement that ripples through the dance-film community. There’s the allure of New York of course, but having your film screen at the festival’s home base at Lincoln Center is not only noteworthy but a thrill.
More...
This year’s forty-first anniversary edition, produced by the Dance Films Association, boasted an international array of short films, archival pieces, documentaries, a retrospective of Shirley Clarke’s pioneering work, two programs of short films billed as “installations” (more on that later), as well as artists’ talks and other related exhibitions.
The festival’s administrative team is a new one – Christy Park, the DFA Executive Director, Liz Wolff, the DFA Festival Co-Curator, alongside longtime Film Society at Lincoln Center Festival Co-Curator Joanna Ney – so perhaps it’s too soon to gauge the direction they’re setting for the event, both for its own American dance filmmaker constituency, but also for participants from abroad. A festival should be a golden opportunity to see lots of material and get a better sense of the state of the art, mingle with colleagues and meet presenters in the field. At this edition, which ran from February 1st-5th, it appeared there was little attempt to highlight foreign filmmakers or bring participants together in meaningful dialogue. An exception was a brief meet-and-greet that was quickly eclipsed by a screening and a book signing at other venues. No programmers from international dance-film events were present at festival events. Nor were the press in evidence. Perhaps the most egregious oversight was not providing all filmmakers with nametags – only one tag was given per film. Most events were sold out, which was good for the festival, but because most filmmakers didn’t have a festival pass many didn’t see the films of their colleagues.
Who By Fire by Jacob Niedzwiecki with Buck 65 and Jenn Grant
Canadians were nonetheless well represented on screen. Gabrielle Lamb’s En Avant, Jacob Niedzwiecki’s Who By Fire, Thibault Duverneix and Victor Quijada’s Gravity of Center, Duncan McDowall’s Painted, and the short film Marlene Millar and I co-directed and produced, Dafeena, were featured in short film programs or screenings before features or documentaries. Our homegrown films stood shoulder to shoulder with offerings from the UK, France, Mexico, Russia, Japan, Spain, Australia, Italy, Sweden, Germany, Israel and the USA. A couple of highlights that I managed to see included the documentary Lads Go Dancing, a Swiss production by filmmaker Steve Walker about the Bern Ballet collaboration with rock band Kummerbuben, and the beautifully shot Menuett, by Finnish filmmaker Jukka Rajala-Granstubb.
The Shirley Clarke schedule of films – including Donna Cameron’s 1990 documentary portrait, Shirley Clarke: In Our Time, as well as Clarke’s own Dance in the Sun (1953), adapted from choreography by Daniel Nagrin, In Paris Parks .(1954), Bullfight (1955), and number of her other short 16-mm films – was significant. During Clarke’s lifetime (she died in 1997) her films and career rarely got the attention they deserved. The DCF retrospective coincided with the HD release of Cameron’s documentary as part of a tribute to Clarke’s life and work. Clarke began her artistic career as a dancer, training with the matriarchs of modern dance, including Martha Graham, Doris Humphrey and Hanya Holm. She turned to cinema and become a leading member of the independent filmmaking community in New York, co-founding the cinema-verité collective Film-Makers’ Cooperative alongside Albert Maysles and D.A. Pennebaker. Friends and collaborators included John Cassavetes, Agnes Varda and Maya Deren. Her faux documentary The Connections, about a group of heroin junkies, won the International Critics Prize at Cannes in 1966. The film ran afoul of the censors, due to its charged language. Her documentary Portrait of Jason (1967), about gay hustler and aspiring nightclub entertainer Jason Holliday, remains one of the most respected LGBT films. She was one of the few women working in the field at that time and was not always taken seriously, feeling the sting of discrimination throughout her career. Even receiving an Oscar for Best Documentary Feature for Robert Frost: A Lover’s Quarrel (1963) couldn’t enhance her clout in the film industry. In fact, she found it difficult to get financing for her films and was increasingly marginalized. Although she influenced many filmmakers, there has never been a significant re-release of her films.
Gravity of Center preview by Thibaut Duverneix with Rubberbandance Group
Not surprisingly DCF heavily supports and promotes American-made films, and as such provided a window into the financing for dance films stateside, which is limited at best. Many of the films credit university departments for their funding, while others seemed to be self-financed as no sources of funding whatsoever appeared in the credits. The Canadian ones were tagged with nods to either BravoFACT (clearly the last round of dance films to get funded by the foundation) and/or the Canada Council for the Arts, as well as other sources, and that alone speaks to a commitment to support this important and essential art form in our country.
I sensed that quite a number of the films screened were DIY projects, which is not necessarily a bad thing; however production values were wildly divergent and unjustified length was a serious issue - many pieces just went on and on with no sense of montage. Directors of photography were largely absent from many of the American offerings, which leads me to question what perspective these dance filmmakers are espousing: does capturing dance eclipse film language, so that even the basics of medium shots and close-ups aren’t explored? Too many of the films on view had no sound design or live sound recording, just a wallpaper music overlay, which makes me wonder if filmmakers are losing a grasp of these skills. Are we riding a wave of copycat production wherein bad practices are repeated? Or is it simply a case of people having easy access to a camera? Where is the power of camera movement and cutting rhythm? Creating dance film should be a collaboration between choreographer and filmmaker. Matthew Diamond’s 1999 Oscar-nominated documentary Dancemaker was screened again at this year’s festival. It’s important to remember what he once said about the making of dance films: “Shooting dance is not so much hard as it is insanely delicate. Wrong angle, wrong shot, wrong edit and the whole thing falls apart.”
Still shot of Aarti Joseph and Atri Nundy in Dafeena by Marlene Millar and Philip Szporer with choreography by Natasha Bakht
At the DCF “installation” stream of programming, I was expecting/hoping for an interactive gallery experience. But at the lovely 25CPW Gallery Space on Central Park West, the festival chose a bare white wall on which to project two clusters of films, never even turning off the gallery’s glaring lights. The festival program indicated that these films “inherit an experimental traditional whose origins can be found in European avant-garde movements of the twenties. Some are themselves experimental in nature, some are not; but they are challenging, meditative, and brave.” I’m not going to throw about criticisms of this or that film, but the vast majority of what was shown didn’t meet the context for the series. Sitting on the concrete floor for ninety minutes each time didn’t add to the experience.
Critic and writer Deborah Jowitt once wisely said something to the effect that bad dance is bad dance, no matter how imaginatively it’s filmed, and wondrous dance can still survive even the worst of renderings. That may be true, but with so much expertise at our disposal, it’s imperative that the goal of filmmakers be more than just achieving the marriage of two art forms.
Learn more >> vimeo.com/channels/danceoncamerafestival
Dafeena, Gravity of Center and Painted will all be at the 31st International Festival of Films on Art (FIFA) in Montréal, March 14th through 24th, 2013.
Dafeena, directed by Philip Szporer and Marlene Millar and featuring the choreography of Natasha Bakht will be available for streaming at bravofact.com later this year.
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
The Pursuit of Perfection Contest
Enter to WIN a copy of The Pursuit of Perfection: A Life of Celia Franca by Carol Bishop-Gwyn here.
(*Note: contest is not open to Dance Media Group staff, Board of Directors, contributors or residents of Québec)
Louise Quick on Cabaret, Bob Fosse and life on Broadway
Interview by Moze Mossanen
Bob Fosse cast Louise Quick as a Kit Kat Klub dancer for his movie version of Cabaret in 1971. In the film, she is introduced by the Master of Ceremonies (played by Joel Grey) as ‘Helga’ in the lineup of dancers during the first number, Willkommen. Louise went on to work with Fosse on a number of subsequent projects, including Liza with a Z and Pippin. Filmmaker Moze Mossanen conducted an interview with Quick on December 24, 2012. Their conversation has been edited and condensed.
More...
Moze Mossanen: Tell me about your background--where you were born, where you studied and what brought you to New York.
Louise Quick: I grew up in Mobile, Alabama. My dance teacher took me to New York when I was eleven. I had six summers to study before I moved up for good when I was sixteen in my senior year. I also studied with a Russian ballet mistress for three years and was at the American School of Ballet as well. But my first job was in a nightclub in Pittsburgh. It was a mistake--I should never have gone to a place like that when I was seventeen. But then I started working in stock and my first Broadway show Bye Bye Birdie happened in 1960. I think I did a total of nine Broadway shows including No Strings (the national tour), Golden Boy and Half a Six-Pence. They were all good shows; my only flop was Fig Leaves Are Falling, unfortunate because I had a big role in it. David Cassidy played my little brother and Barry Nelson played my father -- all back in 1969. We had four big performances and then it closed! George Abbott directed it and Eddie Gasper, who was one of Bob Fosse’s assistants, choreographed it.
And then there was [the original production of] Sweet Charity, a revival of Cancan at City Centre and Pippin, of course. My last Broadway show was The Best Little Whorehouse In Texas. Then I got into choreographing which I didn’t enjoy that much.
I [did] a production of Sweet Charity and a production of Pippin and a couple of other original shows. I discovered I loved directing. You see, my knees were going and I didn’t have the nerve to start all over as actor. But then I was out of the business and I was a telemarketer for a few years. The last ten years or so I’ve been toe dipping, just doing what people ask me [to do]. I directed a production of Pippin in St. Louis, which was exciting. And I assisted Liza Minnelli on her show (Liza’s at the Palace) which was great. And then I had a cabaret show of my own a few years ago but Hurricane Irene hit and that was that. It left me homeless; on top of that, I had cancer. But I’m okay now. Right now I’m still living out of a suitcase but I’m having some work done on my home which is why I’m not working on my show right now. I don’t know if I’ll be ready for the spring but maybe for the fall. And that’s where I’m at right now.
MM: Tell me about the time you first met Bob Fosse.
LQ: In 1957 I auditioned for him for Redhead on Broadway but I was eliminated immediately. Then, a few years went by, and I saw the Actor’s Fund benefit for Sweet Charity [prior to its Broadway opening] and I knew I had to do it. Six months later they were auditioning for replacements and I auditioned and I got it. I did Charity for about a year. That was in 1966. And then, lo and behold, a few years later I got a letter to do the movie [version] of Sweet Charity. I couldn’t believe it because I heard you had to audition for Fosse for anything, even if he knew you. But he called me up and I did the Sweet Charity movie. And then I got a call to do the movie of Cabaret. I thought, ‘Does this mean I’m a real Bob Fosse dancer! [laughs]’ After Cabaret, I stayed in Germany for a year and after I came back, Bob called again and said ‘I’m doing a new Broadway show and would you assist me?’ Well, I had never assisted before and had no idea what assisting was about. I told him that I had worked so hard as a performer [and wanted to stay a performer]; so, no. But later he called again and said ‘I’m doing a TV show and it’s got only about five weeks of rehearsal.’ This time, I said ‘okay’; and I’m glad I did because that show ended up being Liza with a Z. And then came Pippin where I assisted Bob as well. So, I’m the only living person who worked with Bob on all three of his triple-crown projects. (Cabaret, Liza with and Z and Pippin.)
MM: He must’ve thought highly of you to do all that work with him.
LQ: I never had much self-esteem and never thought about that until years later. But now, talking with people about those days, I say to myself: ‘My goodness, I was really lucky.’ I started realizing that people are really interested in these shows and movies and really respond to them. I can see that they were a huge part of our showbiz history.
MM: How much preparation did you do for Cabaret before you left to shoot in Germany?
LQ: We rehearsed for six weeks in Germany and the shooting was around six weeks for the dance sequences. And then the film went on location and I went along with the crew where I stood in for Liza. But I know Bob did a lot of preparation before he left for Germany. He had one German film assistant director in Germany [Wolfgang Glattes] but it was very possible that he did a lot of preparation with his American dance assistant, John Sharpe, most likely at the Broadway Arts studio in New York. [His second dance assistant, a German, was Uta Beil.]
MM: I can only imagine getting the gig to direct Cabaret was a big deal for him.
LQ: Oh, sure. Remember that Fosse was not a sought-after movie director at that time. Sweet Charity [which had been released a few years before] was not well received and he was just floating, becoming a sponge, travelling, taking acting classes, doing whatever he could do to sharpen his game.
MM: Tell me about your arrival in Germany to shoot the movie and your meeting with the other cast members and how rehearsals began.
LQ: There were two dancers hired from America--Kathryn Doby and myself--and four German dancers hired in Germany. Kathryn and I stayed in a hotel in the Schwabing district, near Leopoldstrasse in Munich. And we started working right away with the dancers and Bob’s two assistants and with Fred Werner, the rehearsal pianist. How can I explain how it was to work with him? It’s so hard to put into words. Let’s just say that the experience starts at the moment you know you’re going to work with him. The other dancers spoke a little English but there was such mutual respect between Bob and his crew and the German dancers. You see, the German dancers were not accustomed to being treated so well. For example, when he excused a dancer during the auditions, he would shake their hand and say ‘Thank you for coming.’ They had never been spoken to like that before. So it was easy to see why the dancers in Germany fell in love with him. And that expression ‘thank you for coming’ became a [catchphrase] in Europe. It became a funny line--as a way to show respect for someone. And because of that respect, he got about 150 percent from everyone. When he works, he works full out. There’s no ‘marking.”
MM: I read somewhere that some of the Germans who came across the production were quite uncomfortable with part of their painful history being revisited again. Did you come across any of that?
LQ: When we were shooting in the studio it was not apparent. But on location it was different. There were a few incidents. When we filmed the song, Tomorrow Belongs to Me [which is sung by a member of the Nazi Youth], there was one person in the biergarten who really freaked out and had to be escorted off the set. He got totally wrapped up in the Nazi fervour shown in the scene. And then there was also one neighbourhood street scene where it was very uncomfortable-- the scene where there was a cop on a horse, an SS guard. It was a relatively poor neighbourhood, and there were some people there who got overtly nasty. And [there was] another incident with a friend of the still photographer, who was a former junkie and quite effeminate. A bunch of people took him into a store and beat him up. Not sure if the reason was drugs or his being an American associated with the film. It wasn’t a story that got around; they kept a lid on it.
MM: Were there any particular moments during rehearsals that stood out for you?
LQ: I remember one time we were working and it was just Ute [one of the dancers] and John [Fosse’s assistant] and Kathryn Doby and me. Bob wanted someone to do a flip but he would always do it himself to make sure it was safe. So he did it but he landed smack on his face. It was not good! But he quickly turns to us and says: ‘Don’t tell Gwen! Please, don’t tell Gwen!’ [Gwen Verdon, Fosse’s wife at the time.]
MM: I also read that Gwen helped Bob a lot on the film.
LQ: Oh, absolutely. When Bob was unhappy with all the costumes made for the girls [the Kit Kat Klub dancers], it was Gwen who went out to the thrift shops and brought in racks of clothes for us to wear. And it was Gwen who found the gorilla head in New York and then flew to Germany with the head sitting on her lap on the plane! [The head was part of the gorilla costume that Louise Quick wore in the If You Could See Her Through My Eyes number with Joel Grey.]
MM: What was it like being in that gorilla costume for so long?
LQ: It wasn’t great [laughs]. For one thing, I couldn’t see through the mask. It wasn’t fitted and I was completely in the dark while dancing. With the [Kit Kat Klub] stage being four feet off the floor, I was also always afraid of falling over the edge. In rehearsal, Bob had me rehearse with a bag over my head. With all the turning I did and all the chaînés, it was very hard. And, that moment where I was trying to look into my gorilla purse: Couldn’t see a thing! But I figured out that by moving my head or jaw a certain way, I could bring up my head to see through the nostrils. And that’s how I got through it!
MM: Can I ask how much you were paid for your work back then?
LQ: I made about $200 a week – for both rehearsals and shooting. The German dancers made about 200 Deutsche marks, which, after conversion, was something like $50 a week American.
MM: Were there any moments during shooting that you remember most vividly?
LQ: I remember the extras in the audience. I remember loving their reactions and their acting. They were very much into their parts. And it goes back to Bob treating them so well – as human beings. These actors/extras were not used to that! And when it came to their close-ups, they were treated like stars. They had makeup people, wardrobe… and they were lit as if they were leads. Bob called each one by their name. And it spilled over. Everyone felt they were part of the production. But there was also a feeling that we knew that something really good was being done. There was always this excitement in the air. A tingling. The stagehands bent over backwards to please Bob. At six o’clock at night when the whistle would go off, none of the stagehands would stop working until Bob excused them. That was the kind of respect they had for him.
MM: Tell me about rehearsing and shooting the Mein Herr number, the dance most closely associated not only with Liza Minnelli but with the movie as well.
LQ: Mein Herr was very difficult physically. The thing I remember most is that grotesque, machinelike and bitter anger that comes from the choreography, especially the choreography given to the dancers behind Sally. See, the chorus is behind Sally Bowles but we are doing something entirely different than what she was doing. Sally is flirting but the girls in the background are in counterpoint in some way. It’s almost like a miniature of the movie itself--Sally and her story amidst this Nazi horror story taking place. And you know… I’m not even sure it was a conscious thing on Bob’s part. Not something he did deliberately but something in his subconscious that made it come out that way.
MM: Was anyone hurt physically during the rehearsals or shooting?
LQ: Yes, but we never told Bob if something hurt, because it would really affect him. He would care so much and we didn’t want him distracted. I’ll tell you a little story. It took three days to shoot Mein Herr but on the second day one of the girls didn’t show up for shooting. We learned that she had tried to commit suicide the night before. Nobody told Bob that this had happened--he would’ve been devastated. So Ute took her place and, not knowing the choreography as well as the rest of us, her back became so scraped that the skin peeled back and there was bleeding. But she would never show her back to Bob, always sitting facing him so that he would not know. My own knee problems all started in Mein Herr.
MM: How long was the overall rehearsal and shoot?
LQ: Six weeks to rehearse all the dance and song numbers; six weeks to shoot them, including Liza’s Cabaret number and then six weeks to shoot all of the studio, exterior and on-location scenes. All the interior scenes [like Sally’s apartment] were shot in a studio in Munich, with the street scenes filmed in various locations in Berlin. And the castle was in [the lake district of Eutin; it belonged to the Duke of Oldenberg.] Bob also had me on hand to do all of Liza’s footsteps [for the film’s sound effects recording] in some scenes, including the Cabaret number. I did it again for Liza for her Liza with a Z special a year later.
MM: I love the scene in the rowboat with the butler silently and stoically holding the champagne bucket while Sally, Brian and Max are frolicking around him.
LQ: Yes, but do you know who that butler was? He was the actual butler who once worked for the baron who lived in that castle. Bob heard about this and hired him to become the technical adviser for the dinner party. He had the butler instruct the actors playing the waiters to do it the way it was supposed to be done.
Bob did the same thing with Fritz’s and Natalia’s wedding in the synagogue. He wanted the authenticity of a real Jewish wedding so he asked a rabbi to help out. The rabbi asked to see the script but Bob showed him a watered-down version… well, you can only guess why! Anyway, the rabbi ended up doing it for the film.
MM: Did you know that Bob was going to cross-cut many of the dances with other dramatic elements?
LQ: No, not at all. We had no idea what they would look like. I think he wanted us to stay in the reality and feeling of the dance without knowing the larger picture; it might’ve been distracting.
MM: What do remember most about Liza Minnelli and Joel Grey?
LQ: Liza and Joel are the epitome of class. Just to watch the three of them work was such a treat. There was a great interaction between all of them. It was a great thing to watch.
MM: Given the incredible success of the movie all over the world, as well as its being recognized as one of the top musicals of all time, did it change your life in any way?
LQ: It didn’t change my life but when people find out I was in the movie, their faces light up. If it did change me, it changed me inside, in that it gave me more self-esteem. I can look at the movie, look at how great it is and what a great piece of art it is and say: ‘I was a part of that.’
The 40th anniversary of Cabaret the movie was celebrated recently with the Warner Brothers re-release of the groundbreaking musical on Blu-ray.
See Moze Mossanen’s review in the March/April 2013 edition of The Dance Current.
Learn more >> For an in-depth and excellent look at the making of the movie, read Cabaret by Stephen Tropiano, published by Limelight Editions, 2011.
More information about Cabaret can also be found at officiallizaminnelli.com
Moze Mossanen is an independent filmmaker who has created a body of popular and critically acclaimed work blending drama, music and dance. These films include the award-winning feature-length doc Dance for Modern Times and numerous works created especially for television. His most recent films, Love Lies Bleeding and Romeos & Juliets, both aired on CBC in 2012.
Bob Fosse cast Louise Quick as a Kit Kat Klub dancer for his movie version of Cabaret in 1971. In the film, she is introduced by the Master of Ceremonies (played by Joel Grey) as ‘Helga’ in the lineup of dancers during the first number, Willkommen. Louise went on to work with Fosse on a number of subsequent projects, including Liza with a Z and Pippin. Filmmaker Moze Mossanen conducted an interview with Quick on December 24, 2012. Their conversation has been edited and condensed.
More...
Moze Mossanen: Tell me about your background--where you were born, where you studied and what brought you to New York.
Louise Quick: I grew up in Mobile, Alabama. My dance teacher took me to New York when I was eleven. I had six summers to study before I moved up for good when I was sixteen in my senior year. I also studied with a Russian ballet mistress for three years and was at the American School of Ballet as well. But my first job was in a nightclub in Pittsburgh. It was a mistake--I should never have gone to a place like that when I was seventeen. But then I started working in stock and my first Broadway show Bye Bye Birdie happened in 1960. I think I did a total of nine Broadway shows including No Strings (the national tour), Golden Boy and Half a Six-Pence. They were all good shows; my only flop was Fig Leaves Are Falling, unfortunate because I had a big role in it. David Cassidy played my little brother and Barry Nelson played my father -- all back in 1969. We had four big performances and then it closed! George Abbott directed it and Eddie Gasper, who was one of Bob Fosse’s assistants, choreographed it.
And then there was [the original production of] Sweet Charity, a revival of Cancan at City Centre and Pippin, of course. My last Broadway show was The Best Little Whorehouse In Texas. Then I got into choreographing which I didn’t enjoy that much.
I [did] a production of Sweet Charity and a production of Pippin and a couple of other original shows. I discovered I loved directing. You see, my knees were going and I didn’t have the nerve to start all over as actor. But then I was out of the business and I was a telemarketer for a few years. The last ten years or so I’ve been toe dipping, just doing what people ask me [to do]. I directed a production of Pippin in St. Louis, which was exciting. And I assisted Liza Minnelli on her show (Liza’s at the Palace) which was great. And then I had a cabaret show of my own a few years ago but Hurricane Irene hit and that was that. It left me homeless; on top of that, I had cancer. But I’m okay now. Right now I’m still living out of a suitcase but I’m having some work done on my home which is why I’m not working on my show right now. I don’t know if I’ll be ready for the spring but maybe for the fall. And that’s where I’m at right now.
MM: Tell me about the time you first met Bob Fosse.
LQ: In 1957 I auditioned for him for Redhead on Broadway but I was eliminated immediately. Then, a few years went by, and I saw the Actor’s Fund benefit for Sweet Charity [prior to its Broadway opening] and I knew I had to do it. Six months later they were auditioning for replacements and I auditioned and I got it. I did Charity for about a year. That was in 1966. And then, lo and behold, a few years later I got a letter to do the movie [version] of Sweet Charity. I couldn’t believe it because I heard you had to audition for Fosse for anything, even if he knew you. But he called me up and I did the Sweet Charity movie. And then I got a call to do the movie of Cabaret. I thought, ‘Does this mean I’m a real Bob Fosse dancer! [laughs]’ After Cabaret, I stayed in Germany for a year and after I came back, Bob called again and said ‘I’m doing a new Broadway show and would you assist me?’ Well, I had never assisted before and had no idea what assisting was about. I told him that I had worked so hard as a performer [and wanted to stay a performer]; so, no. But later he called again and said ‘I’m doing a TV show and it’s got only about five weeks of rehearsal.’ This time, I said ‘okay’; and I’m glad I did because that show ended up being Liza with a Z. And then came Pippin where I assisted Bob as well. So, I’m the only living person who worked with Bob on all three of his triple-crown projects. (Cabaret, Liza with and Z and Pippin.)
MM: He must’ve thought highly of you to do all that work with him.
LQ: I never had much self-esteem and never thought about that until years later. But now, talking with people about those days, I say to myself: ‘My goodness, I was really lucky.’ I started realizing that people are really interested in these shows and movies and really respond to them. I can see that they were a huge part of our showbiz history.
MM: How much preparation did you do for Cabaret before you left to shoot in Germany?
LQ: We rehearsed for six weeks in Germany and the shooting was around six weeks for the dance sequences. And then the film went on location and I went along with the crew where I stood in for Liza. But I know Bob did a lot of preparation before he left for Germany. He had one German film assistant director in Germany [Wolfgang Glattes] but it was very possible that he did a lot of preparation with his American dance assistant, John Sharpe, most likely at the Broadway Arts studio in New York. [His second dance assistant, a German, was Uta Beil.]
MM: I can only imagine getting the gig to direct Cabaret was a big deal for him.
LQ: Oh, sure. Remember that Fosse was not a sought-after movie director at that time. Sweet Charity [which had been released a few years before] was not well received and he was just floating, becoming a sponge, travelling, taking acting classes, doing whatever he could do to sharpen his game.
MM: Tell me about your arrival in Germany to shoot the movie and your meeting with the other cast members and how rehearsals began.
LQ: There were two dancers hired from America--Kathryn Doby and myself--and four German dancers hired in Germany. Kathryn and I stayed in a hotel in the Schwabing district, near Leopoldstrasse in Munich. And we started working right away with the dancers and Bob’s two assistants and with Fred Werner, the rehearsal pianist. How can I explain how it was to work with him? It’s so hard to put into words. Let’s just say that the experience starts at the moment you know you’re going to work with him. The other dancers spoke a little English but there was such mutual respect between Bob and his crew and the German dancers. You see, the German dancers were not accustomed to being treated so well. For example, when he excused a dancer during the auditions, he would shake their hand and say ‘Thank you for coming.’ They had never been spoken to like that before. So it was easy to see why the dancers in Germany fell in love with him. And that expression ‘thank you for coming’ became a [catchphrase] in Europe. It became a funny line--as a way to show respect for someone. And because of that respect, he got about 150 percent from everyone. When he works, he works full out. There’s no ‘marking.”
MM: I read somewhere that some of the Germans who came across the production were quite uncomfortable with part of their painful history being revisited again. Did you come across any of that?
LQ: When we were shooting in the studio it was not apparent. But on location it was different. There were a few incidents. When we filmed the song, Tomorrow Belongs to Me [which is sung by a member of the Nazi Youth], there was one person in the biergarten who really freaked out and had to be escorted off the set. He got totally wrapped up in the Nazi fervour shown in the scene. And then there was also one neighbourhood street scene where it was very uncomfortable-- the scene where there was a cop on a horse, an SS guard. It was a relatively poor neighbourhood, and there were some people there who got overtly nasty. And [there was] another incident with a friend of the still photographer, who was a former junkie and quite effeminate. A bunch of people took him into a store and beat him up. Not sure if the reason was drugs or his being an American associated with the film. It wasn’t a story that got around; they kept a lid on it.
MM: Were there any particular moments during rehearsals that stood out for you?
LQ: I remember one time we were working and it was just Ute [one of the dancers] and John [Fosse’s assistant] and Kathryn Doby and me. Bob wanted someone to do a flip but he would always do it himself to make sure it was safe. So he did it but he landed smack on his face. It was not good! But he quickly turns to us and says: ‘Don’t tell Gwen! Please, don’t tell Gwen!’ [Gwen Verdon, Fosse’s wife at the time.]
MM: I also read that Gwen helped Bob a lot on the film.
LQ: Oh, absolutely. When Bob was unhappy with all the costumes made for the girls [the Kit Kat Klub dancers], it was Gwen who went out to the thrift shops and brought in racks of clothes for us to wear. And it was Gwen who found the gorilla head in New York and then flew to Germany with the head sitting on her lap on the plane! [The head was part of the gorilla costume that Louise Quick wore in the If You Could See Her Through My Eyes number with Joel Grey.]
MM: What was it like being in that gorilla costume for so long?
LQ: It wasn’t great [laughs]. For one thing, I couldn’t see through the mask. It wasn’t fitted and I was completely in the dark while dancing. With the [Kit Kat Klub] stage being four feet off the floor, I was also always afraid of falling over the edge. In rehearsal, Bob had me rehearse with a bag over my head. With all the turning I did and all the chaînés, it was very hard. And, that moment where I was trying to look into my gorilla purse: Couldn’t see a thing! But I figured out that by moving my head or jaw a certain way, I could bring up my head to see through the nostrils. And that’s how I got through it!
MM: Can I ask how much you were paid for your work back then?
LQ: I made about $200 a week – for both rehearsals and shooting. The German dancers made about 200 Deutsche marks, which, after conversion, was something like $50 a week American.
MM: Were there any moments during shooting that you remember most vividly?
LQ: I remember the extras in the audience. I remember loving their reactions and their acting. They were very much into their parts. And it goes back to Bob treating them so well – as human beings. These actors/extras were not used to that! And when it came to their close-ups, they were treated like stars. They had makeup people, wardrobe… and they were lit as if they were leads. Bob called each one by their name. And it spilled over. Everyone felt they were part of the production. But there was also a feeling that we knew that something really good was being done. There was always this excitement in the air. A tingling. The stagehands bent over backwards to please Bob. At six o’clock at night when the whistle would go off, none of the stagehands would stop working until Bob excused them. That was the kind of respect they had for him.
MM: Tell me about rehearsing and shooting the Mein Herr number, the dance most closely associated not only with Liza Minnelli but with the movie as well.
LQ: Mein Herr was very difficult physically. The thing I remember most is that grotesque, machinelike and bitter anger that comes from the choreography, especially the choreography given to the dancers behind Sally. See, the chorus is behind Sally Bowles but we are doing something entirely different than what she was doing. Sally is flirting but the girls in the background are in counterpoint in some way. It’s almost like a miniature of the movie itself--Sally and her story amidst this Nazi horror story taking place. And you know… I’m not even sure it was a conscious thing on Bob’s part. Not something he did deliberately but something in his subconscious that made it come out that way.
MM: Was anyone hurt physically during the rehearsals or shooting?
LQ: Yes, but we never told Bob if something hurt, because it would really affect him. He would care so much and we didn’t want him distracted. I’ll tell you a little story. It took three days to shoot Mein Herr but on the second day one of the girls didn’t show up for shooting. We learned that she had tried to commit suicide the night before. Nobody told Bob that this had happened--he would’ve been devastated. So Ute took her place and, not knowing the choreography as well as the rest of us, her back became so scraped that the skin peeled back and there was bleeding. But she would never show her back to Bob, always sitting facing him so that he would not know. My own knee problems all started in Mein Herr.
MM: How long was the overall rehearsal and shoot?
LQ: Six weeks to rehearse all the dance and song numbers; six weeks to shoot them, including Liza’s Cabaret number and then six weeks to shoot all of the studio, exterior and on-location scenes. All the interior scenes [like Sally’s apartment] were shot in a studio in Munich, with the street scenes filmed in various locations in Berlin. And the castle was in [the lake district of Eutin; it belonged to the Duke of Oldenberg.] Bob also had me on hand to do all of Liza’s footsteps [for the film’s sound effects recording] in some scenes, including the Cabaret number. I did it again for Liza for her Liza with a Z special a year later.
MM: I love the scene in the rowboat with the butler silently and stoically holding the champagne bucket while Sally, Brian and Max are frolicking around him.
LQ: Yes, but do you know who that butler was? He was the actual butler who once worked for the baron who lived in that castle. Bob heard about this and hired him to become the technical adviser for the dinner party. He had the butler instruct the actors playing the waiters to do it the way it was supposed to be done.
Bob did the same thing with Fritz’s and Natalia’s wedding in the synagogue. He wanted the authenticity of a real Jewish wedding so he asked a rabbi to help out. The rabbi asked to see the script but Bob showed him a watered-down version… well, you can only guess why! Anyway, the rabbi ended up doing it for the film.
MM: Did you know that Bob was going to cross-cut many of the dances with other dramatic elements?
LQ: No, not at all. We had no idea what they would look like. I think he wanted us to stay in the reality and feeling of the dance without knowing the larger picture; it might’ve been distracting.
MM: What do remember most about Liza Minnelli and Joel Grey?
LQ: Liza and Joel are the epitome of class. Just to watch the three of them work was such a treat. There was a great interaction between all of them. It was a great thing to watch.
MM: Given the incredible success of the movie all over the world, as well as its being recognized as one of the top musicals of all time, did it change your life in any way?
LQ: It didn’t change my life but when people find out I was in the movie, their faces light up. If it did change me, it changed me inside, in that it gave me more self-esteem. I can look at the movie, look at how great it is and what a great piece of art it is and say: ‘I was a part of that.’
The 40th anniversary of Cabaret the movie was celebrated recently with the Warner Brothers re-release of the groundbreaking musical on Blu-ray.
See Moze Mossanen’s review in the March/April 2013 edition of The Dance Current.
Learn more >> For an in-depth and excellent look at the making of the movie, read Cabaret by Stephen Tropiano, published by Limelight Editions, 2011.
More information about Cabaret can also be found at officiallizaminnelli.com
Moze Mossanen is an independent filmmaker who has created a body of popular and critically acclaimed work blending drama, music and dance. These films include the award-winning feature-length doc Dance for Modern Times and numerous works created especially for television. His most recent films, Love Lies Bleeding and Romeos & Juliets, both aired on CBC in 2012.
Feature: Phoenix
The Life and Times of Eddy Toussaint
By Linde Howe-Beck
Summary | Sommaire
Eddy Toussaint / Photo by Linde Howe-Beck
Like a perpetual phoenix, Eddy Toussaint, founder/artistic director of Ballet de Montréal Eddy Toussaint, one of Montreal’s most popular companies during the dance boom days of the seventies and eighties, has risen from the ashes of his wide-ranging career and returned home.
Comme un perpétuel phénix, Eddy Toussaint, fondateur et directeur artistique du Ballet de Montréal Eddy Toussaint, renaît des cendres de sa vaste carrière et revient au bercail. Sa compagnie était une des plus populaires à Montréal lors de l’essor de la danse dans les années 70 et 80.
More...
Toussaint has formed a project-based chamber ballet group of young dancers called Ballet Eddy Toussaint de Montréal, (the original company closed shop in 1990). He has always been a controversial figure in Montréal. A man who treasures his extended family and who tries to live true to his Catholic beliefs, nevertheless, he has outspoken ways and a hot temper that have led to many a tense moment during his long and varied career. “I know I am known to be difficult. I am happy to be,” Toussaint explains with typical verve and pride. These days, in two modest studios in a thriving commercial area in Montreal’s West End, the 67-year old Toussaint works with his school’s three teachers and his company, aspiring to pass on the purity of ballet to a new generation of dancers.
Dernièrement, sous presque le même nom que sa première compagnie fermée en 1990, Toussaint met sur pied un groupe de jeunes danseurs de ballet qui fonctionne par projet. Il a toujours été une figure controversée à Montréal. Il chérit sa famille et adhère le plus possible à ses croyances catholiques. Néanmoins, son franc-parler et sa mèche courte ont provoqué quelques moments tendus au cours de son long parcours diversifié. « Je sais qu’on me connaît comme étant difficile. Ça me plaît », déclare-t-il fidèle à lui-même, avec verve et fierté. Aujourd’hui, à 67 ans, il travaille avec les trois professeurs de son école dans deux modestes studios dans un quartier d’affaires en pleine effervescence dans l’ouest de Montréal. Il aspire à transmettre la pureté du ballet à une nouvelle génération de danseurs.
Toussaint with Camilla Malashenko in rehearsal with Ballet de Montréal Eddy Toussaint / Photo courtesy of Toussaint
Read the full article in the March/April 2013 issue of The Dance Current print magazine. | Lisez l'article intégral dans l’édition imprimée de mars/avril 2013 du Dance Current.
By Linde Howe-Beck
Summary | Sommaire
Eddy Toussaint / Photo by Linde Howe-Beck
Like a perpetual phoenix, Eddy Toussaint, founder/artistic director of Ballet de Montréal Eddy Toussaint, one of Montreal’s most popular companies during the dance boom days of the seventies and eighties, has risen from the ashes of his wide-ranging career and returned home.
Comme un perpétuel phénix, Eddy Toussaint, fondateur et directeur artistique du Ballet de Montréal Eddy Toussaint, renaît des cendres de sa vaste carrière et revient au bercail. Sa compagnie était une des plus populaires à Montréal lors de l’essor de la danse dans les années 70 et 80.
More...
Toussaint has formed a project-based chamber ballet group of young dancers called Ballet Eddy Toussaint de Montréal, (the original company closed shop in 1990). He has always been a controversial figure in Montréal. A man who treasures his extended family and who tries to live true to his Catholic beliefs, nevertheless, he has outspoken ways and a hot temper that have led to many a tense moment during his long and varied career. “I know I am known to be difficult. I am happy to be,” Toussaint explains with typical verve and pride. These days, in two modest studios in a thriving commercial area in Montreal’s West End, the 67-year old Toussaint works with his school’s three teachers and his company, aspiring to pass on the purity of ballet to a new generation of dancers.
Dernièrement, sous presque le même nom que sa première compagnie fermée en 1990, Toussaint met sur pied un groupe de jeunes danseurs de ballet qui fonctionne par projet. Il a toujours été une figure controversée à Montréal. Il chérit sa famille et adhère le plus possible à ses croyances catholiques. Néanmoins, son franc-parler et sa mèche courte ont provoqué quelques moments tendus au cours de son long parcours diversifié. « Je sais qu’on me connaît comme étant difficile. Ça me plaît », déclare-t-il fidèle à lui-même, avec verve et fierté. Aujourd’hui, à 67 ans, il travaille avec les trois professeurs de son école dans deux modestes studios dans un quartier d’affaires en pleine effervescence dans l’ouest de Montréal. Il aspire à transmettre la pureté du ballet à une nouvelle génération de danseurs.
Toussaint with Camilla Malashenko in rehearsal with Ballet de Montréal Eddy Toussaint / Photo courtesy of Toussaint
Read the full article in the March/April 2013 issue of The Dance Current print magazine. | Lisez l'article intégral dans l’édition imprimée de mars/avril 2013 du Dance Current.
Profile: Heidi Strauss
The Ecologist
By Ben Portis
Summary | Sommaire
Heidi Strauss / Photo by Jeremy Mimnagh
Thirty-nine-year old choreographer Heidi Strauss is about to create her first long-form, large-company piece with Toronto Dance Theatre (TDT). Everyday Anthems will premiere in March at Harbourfront’s 2013 World Stage Festival.
La chorégraphe de 39 ans Heidi Strauss est en création pour sa première pièce intégrale pour un groupe avec le Toronto Dance Theatre (TDT). Everyday Anthems sera présenté en première en mars au World Stage Festival 2013 de Harbourfront.
More...
Following her early training in Sudbury and at the School of TDT, Strauss’ career has been a flurry of independent initiative, creation, collaboration and contribution; for twenty-five years she’s been a catalytic element, constantly moving between adjacent but separate milieus, a cross-pollinator. She has worked with older mavericks who exemplify dignified, self-reliant working processes and do not compromise the things they believe in, such as Peter Chin and Denise Fujiwara. She has had close partnerships with collaborators such as Murray Darroch, Darryl Tracy, Ken Gass and husband Jeremy Mimnagh. Now, in Everyday Anthems, Strauss and her creative team elicit stories from the nine TDT dancers’ real lives and experiences. “Our lives are graphs of events”, she says. “We find ourselves alone; then we find a community. Stories are how we carry people with us”.
Après une formation initiale à Sudbury et à la School of TDT, Strauss entame une carrière emplie d’initiative indépendante en création, en collaboration et en contribution. Depuis vingt-cinq ans, elle est un élément catalytique qui voyage continuellement entre milieux adjacents – elle œuvre en pollinisation croisée. Elle a travaillé avec des non-conformistes plus établis, modèles de processus rigoureux, autonome et de fidélité à leurs valeurs, tels que Peter Chin et Denise Fujiwara. Elle a travaillé en étroite collaboration avec des artistes comme Murray Darroch, Darryl Tracy, Ken Gass et son mari Jeremy Mimnagh. Maintenant, dans Everyday Anthems, Strauss et son équipe glanent des histoires vécues des neuf danseurs de TDT. « Une vie est une carte d’événements », dit-elle. « On se trouve seul et ensuite on trouve une communauté. Nous portons les autres dans nos histoires. »
Read the full profile in the March/April 2013 issue of The Dance Current print magazine. | Lisez l'article intégral dans l’édition imprimée de mars/avril 2013 du Dance Current.
By Ben Portis
Summary | Sommaire
Heidi Strauss / Photo by Jeremy Mimnagh
Thirty-nine-year old choreographer Heidi Strauss is about to create her first long-form, large-company piece with Toronto Dance Theatre (TDT). Everyday Anthems will premiere in March at Harbourfront’s 2013 World Stage Festival.
La chorégraphe de 39 ans Heidi Strauss est en création pour sa première pièce intégrale pour un groupe avec le Toronto Dance Theatre (TDT). Everyday Anthems sera présenté en première en mars au World Stage Festival 2013 de Harbourfront.
More...
Following her early training in Sudbury and at the School of TDT, Strauss’ career has been a flurry of independent initiative, creation, collaboration and contribution; for twenty-five years she’s been a catalytic element, constantly moving between adjacent but separate milieus, a cross-pollinator. She has worked with older mavericks who exemplify dignified, self-reliant working processes and do not compromise the things they believe in, such as Peter Chin and Denise Fujiwara. She has had close partnerships with collaborators such as Murray Darroch, Darryl Tracy, Ken Gass and husband Jeremy Mimnagh. Now, in Everyday Anthems, Strauss and her creative team elicit stories from the nine TDT dancers’ real lives and experiences. “Our lives are graphs of events”, she says. “We find ourselves alone; then we find a community. Stories are how we carry people with us”.
Après une formation initiale à Sudbury et à la School of TDT, Strauss entame une carrière emplie d’initiative indépendante en création, en collaboration et en contribution. Depuis vingt-cinq ans, elle est un élément catalytique qui voyage continuellement entre milieux adjacents – elle œuvre en pollinisation croisée. Elle a travaillé avec des non-conformistes plus établis, modèles de processus rigoureux, autonome et de fidélité à leurs valeurs, tels que Peter Chin et Denise Fujiwara. Elle a travaillé en étroite collaboration avec des artistes comme Murray Darroch, Darryl Tracy, Ken Gass et son mari Jeremy Mimnagh. Maintenant, dans Everyday Anthems, Strauss et son équipe glanent des histoires vécues des neuf danseurs de TDT. « Une vie est une carte d’événements », dit-elle. « On se trouve seul et ensuite on trouve une communauté. Nous portons les autres dans nos histoires. »
Read the full profile in the March/April 2013 issue of The Dance Current print magazine. | Lisez l'article intégral dans l’édition imprimée de mars/avril 2013 du Dance Current.
In Conversation: Jazzing Culture/Culturing Jazz
Summary | Sommaire
Caroline Fraser and Deanne Walsh in Why Dance? 3D by Michèle Moss / Photo by Tony Field
Many styles and forms fall under the rubric of jazz dance, from the social dances of the swing era, to the jazz musicality of tap, to the modern jazz of Broadway and Hollywood. The characteristics that unite these forms are their propulsive rhythm, a focus on improvisation and a low centre of gravity generally recognized as having roots in African dance.
La rubrique de danse « jazz » regroupe de nombreux styles, des danses sociales de l’époque du swing dance, à la musicalité jazz de la danse à claquettes, au jazz moderne de Broadway et de Hollywood. Ses formes partagent un rythme entraînant, une mise en valeur de l’improvisation et un accent sur le poids du corps proche du sol généralement attribué à des origines en danse africaine.
More...
Jazz dance scholars Shawn Newman and Melissa Templeton organized a roundtable discussion for the Canadian Society of Dance Studies 2012 conference in Montréal. Inspired by the conference theme, “collaboration,” they brought together a group of distinguished jazz practitioners and scholars to discuss their work. Participants included Ethel Bruneau, Vicki St. Denys, Eva von Gencsy and Michèle Moss. In the true spirit of jazz, this improvised conversation brought many vibrant voices together creating a playful discussion on the place of jazz dance in Canada.
Les chercheurs en jazz Shawn Newman et Melissa Templeton ont organisé une table ronde pour le colloque de la Société canadienne d’études en danse à Montréal en 2012. Inspirés par le thème du colloque – la collaboration, ils ont réuni des praticiens et chercheurs chevronnés en jazz pour discuter de leur travail, dont Ethel Bruneau, Vicki St. Denys, Eva von Gencsy et Michèle Moss. Dans le véritable esprit du jazz, une conversation improvisée et ludique a permis à plusieurs voix vitales de se pencher ensemble sur la place du jazz au Canada.
Read the edited excerpt in the March/April 2013 issue of The Dance Current print magazine. | Lisez l'article intégral dans l’édition imprimée de mars/avril 2013 du Dance Current.
Caroline Fraser and Deanne Walsh in Why Dance? 3D by Michèle Moss / Photo by Tony Field
Many styles and forms fall under the rubric of jazz dance, from the social dances of the swing era, to the jazz musicality of tap, to the modern jazz of Broadway and Hollywood. The characteristics that unite these forms are their propulsive rhythm, a focus on improvisation and a low centre of gravity generally recognized as having roots in African dance.
La rubrique de danse « jazz » regroupe de nombreux styles, des danses sociales de l’époque du swing dance, à la musicalité jazz de la danse à claquettes, au jazz moderne de Broadway et de Hollywood. Ses formes partagent un rythme entraînant, une mise en valeur de l’improvisation et un accent sur le poids du corps proche du sol généralement attribué à des origines en danse africaine.
More...
Jazz dance scholars Shawn Newman and Melissa Templeton organized a roundtable discussion for the Canadian Society of Dance Studies 2012 conference in Montréal. Inspired by the conference theme, “collaboration,” they brought together a group of distinguished jazz practitioners and scholars to discuss their work. Participants included Ethel Bruneau, Vicki St. Denys, Eva von Gencsy and Michèle Moss. In the true spirit of jazz, this improvised conversation brought many vibrant voices together creating a playful discussion on the place of jazz dance in Canada.
Les chercheurs en jazz Shawn Newman et Melissa Templeton ont organisé une table ronde pour le colloque de la Société canadienne d’études en danse à Montréal en 2012. Inspirés par le thème du colloque – la collaboration, ils ont réuni des praticiens et chercheurs chevronnés en jazz pour discuter de leur travail, dont Ethel Bruneau, Vicki St. Denys, Eva von Gencsy et Michèle Moss. Dans le véritable esprit du jazz, une conversation improvisée et ludique a permis à plusieurs voix vitales de se pencher ensemble sur la place du jazz au Canada.
Read the edited excerpt in the March/April 2013 issue of The Dance Current print magazine. | Lisez l'article intégral dans l’édition imprimée de mars/avril 2013 du Dance Current.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)